What Can be Done to Fix Restrictor Plate Racing?

Photo Credit: Noel Lanier/Onpitroad.com

I watched the Coke Zero Sugar 400 from Daytona this past Saturday and my biggest takeaway is something needs to be done about restrictor plate racing. I know that it has been said time and again but there has to be some sort of solution to this issue. After watching multiple accidents that eliminated half the field and left all but a handful of cars damaged, now is a good time to discuss what could be done to make the racing at Daytona and Talladega better.

The biggest problem I see right now is that the cars need such a shove to really pass one another that it leads to minor mistakes that takes out large chunks of cars at a time. Restrictor plate racing has always been a crap-shoot at best on what happens. Yes, the “big one” has been around for years and when cars are this tightly bunched together these things are going to happen more often than not because it only takes a slight misjudgment to cause a huge problem. Ricky Stenhouse, Jr. triggered the big accident early in the second stage with a hard push to the rear bumper of Penske Ford Brad Keselowski which sent Keselowski spinning into traffic on the backstretch. Then, shortly afterwards, Stenhouse again found himself in another bad situation when he washed up into Kyle Busch taking Busch and race leader William Byron out of the event.

Let me get the one solution out of the way that many clamor for but will never happen. NASCAR simply cannot take the plates off of the cars at Daytona and Talladega. At least not in the current package. The speeds the cars would reach would be far too dangerous for the drivers and the fans in the grandstands. Plus, the human body can only withstand a certain G-load for an extended period of time. The G-forces the cars would pull at speeds likely in the 240 mph range would be unhealthy for the drivers over an extended period of time. Also, fan safety could not be overlooked. A 3400 pound stock car hurtling into a fence at 240 mph could be a total disaster.

What else could be done? The tandem draft era of races actually helped spread the fields out of the big packs of cars. My biggest problem with those races was the fact that each driver was basically married to one other car the entire race. If they could have separated and hooked up with different drivers throughout the race I feel it would have been a bit more tolerable. Tandem drafting definitely had it’s benefits but I don’t think in the grand scheme of things that’s the answer to solve the problem at these tracks.

That leads me to an aero package that we’ve seen before. After the 2000 running of the Daytona 500 Dale Earnhardt was very vocal about how bad the racing was. Earnhardt was quoted as saying,

That’s the worse racing I’ve seen at Daytona in a long, long time. They took NASCAR Winston Cup racing and made it the sorriest racing, they took racing out of the driver’s and the crew’s hands. We can’t adjust, we can’t make our cars drive like we want. They just killed the racing at Daytona. That’s all I’ve got to say. Mr. Bill France, Sr. is probably rolling over in his grave if he seen that deal.

In response to that, NASCAR changed the aerodynamic package at Daytona and Talladega, making it easier for the driver’s to get runs on one another and slingshot. They unveiled the new package at the October 15th race at Talladega. The package turned out to be an overwhelming success with the race producing 49 lead changes and a finish for the ages. Dale Earnhardt rallied from 18th to 1st in the last five laps of the race. There were only three caution flags in a mostly clean race. Despite the cars being in large packs, they featured a blade across the roof that produced a big hole in the air causing a huge drafting effect with a tall rear spoiler and a wicker bill to produce high drag. By producing so much drag and slowing down the cars, NASCAR was able to let teams run a less restricted plate which allowed for more throttle response by the drivers. This was a popular package that was ran at Daytona and Talladega through the 2002 season. Something similar to this would probably be worth taking a look at by NASCAR.

There’s one other option that could go either way. NASCAR could have the teams remove the rear spoiler altogether and run a different plate that would allow for better throttle response. If the driver’s were having to lift off of the gas to avoid crashing it would more naturally spread the fields out in theory. Perhaps even run a narrower tire for Daytona and Talladega. Anything that would help slow the cars down naturally to allow for a plate that wasn’t choked down as much could help make the racing different at the plate tracks.

One way or another, NASCAR needs to try to address the plate track problems. If they could find a way to help the cars produce bigger holes in the air for a bigger draft effect as well as being able to open up the plates to allow for a little greater overall speed that might just be what it takes. But, inevitably racing at Daytona and Talladega will produce some large crashes from time-to-time no matter what package is being ran. It’s the nature of the beast.

Do you think that the current aero package at Daytona and Talladega works or do you have a different solution? Drop us a comment and let us know what you think!

**The opinions expressed on this site are not necessarily those of the publisher, management or staff. All comments other than website related problems need to be directed to the author. (c)OnPitRoad.com. **

11 Comments

  1. Reduce the engine to 280 cubic inches.
    NASCAR does not want to change the on track product at Daytona and Talladega. At some point the owners should start to complain about the cost of these wrecks as sponsorship dollars continue to become hard to come by.
    I’m glad I didn’t spend time and money to witness that poor excuse for a Stock Car race. In my over 60 yrs. of attending races I’ve never seen that many top cars eliminated from a race. Pathetic.

    • Al, thanks for reading. I wish something could be done to produce a good racing product at these two tracks but not have so much carnage more often than not.

  2. There are 3 viable solutions: 1) reduce the engine size; 2) Cut down the banking; 3) Close the tracks. Of course, all these cost money, so NASCAR will do nothing as usual to end this demolition derby style racing. All the other suggestions are bandaids on a gunshot wound. But NASCAR shills like yourself continue to believe that plate racing can somehow be saved. It cannot be saved and does not deserve to be saved. Yet NASCAR actually wants to expand the carnage to other tracks. Just another nail in the coffin of this trashsport!

    • You are the first person that’s ever called me a NASCAR shill. Take a look at a lot of my articles that burns NASCAR’s hind end over the current racing product. If I’m on NASCAR’s side I’d sure hate to see the guy that’s not. But thanks for reading!

    • I have been in favor of smaller engines across the board for years. Robert Yates himself said in the late 90s that NASCAR needed to get the engines under control. That was coming from an engine builder!

  3. What I can’t believe is that the owners have not at least threatened to boycott the restrictor plate tracks. Every “big one” collectively costs them millions in race cars every time it happens.

    It would be easier in practice than you may think. The Big 6 team owners (Stewart-Haas, Gibbs, Penske, Hendricks, Childress, Furniture Row) get together and agree to effectively “boycott” the race. Now, I understand that to be eligible for the championship they have to start every race. Doesn’t say where they have to finish though… Here is how it would work. Qualify the cars like normal. On lap 2 they all pull the cars behind the wall for “electrical issues”. There is certainly precedent for Na$car allowing that with the regular and many start-and-park cars over the years and currently. Then they “fix” the electrical issue with about 3 to go and get back out on the track to complete the race without a DNF.

    Doesn’t violate any rule I can think of. Na$car says they have to run all out (no following the field 1/2 lap back like the Gibbs cars have tried), but they can spend as much time in the garage as needed to fix a “mechanical issue”. The 5 minute rule only applies to crash damage.

    But what about the championship son! Won’t that affect the championship? Nope, not really. All the championship contenders are still on equal footing, finishing 195 laps down. So the “winner” is championship eligible. So what? Some normal backmarker wins the race and is “eligible”, but that backmarker is not going to be a car in the top 20 when the chase rolls around anyway, so again, who cares? Ray Black (jsut to pick a name) wins one from 39th, but he still isn’t making the playoffs.

    No harm done to the standings, point made to Na$car, that happens once, something WILL change.

    • The sponsor that would be on the car for the race where the drivers done what you mentioned above would not be thrilled for one. That would never happen IMO.

  4. Simple solution. Groove the tires to reduce the contact patch. The problem now is that they can all hold their throttle to the floor without having to lift for the turns.

    Reduce the contact patch and bring handling back into the equation.

    • That would start a riot the likes we’ve never seen. It “would” be interesting though to see how cars could run at Daytona without plates on a road configuration that allowed them to get about 210-220 and able to draft before they hit the inner road course section. A combination of plate drafting and road course racing would definitely be interesting to watch.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*